
United Nations
UNEP/GEF South China Sea
Global Environment
Environment Programme
Project
Facility
Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends
in the
South China Sea and Gulf of Thailand
The First Sub-Committee of the Regional Scientific and Technical Committee
Bangkok, Thailand, 6th 10th February 2006
TRAINING PROGRAMME DEVELOPED BY THE SUB-COMMITTEE
OF THE REGIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
___________________________________________________________________________
UNEP/GEF
Bangkok, February 2006

UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
First published in Thailand in 2006 by the United Nations Environment Programme.
Copyright © 2006, United Nations Environment Programme
This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit
purposes without special permission from the copyright holder provided acknowledgement of the
source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication
as a source.
No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose without prior
permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme.
UNEP/GEF
Project Co-ordinating Unit,
United Nations Environment Programme,
UN Building, 2nd Floor Block B, Rajdamnern Avenue,
Bangkok 10200, Thailand
Tel.
+66 2 288 1886
Fax.
+66 2 288 1094
http://www.unepscs.org
DISCLAIMER:
The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of UNEP or the GEF. The
designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever
on the part of UNEP, of the GEF, or of any cooperating organisation concerning the legal status of
any country, territory, city or area, of its authorities, or of the delineation of its territories or boundaries.
Cover Illustration:
For citation purposes this document may be cited as:
UNEP, 2006. Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in the South China Sea and Gulf of
Thailand. Training Programme Developed by the Sub-Committee of the Regional Scientific and
Technical Committee. UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Table of Contents
1.
BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................1
2.
RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF TRAINING NEEDS ............................................................2
3.
TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES .....................................................................................................2
3.1 TRAINING COURSES...............................................................................................................2
3.1.1 Regional Training Courses.....................................................................................2
3.1.2 Echo Seminars/Workshops ....................................................................................4
3.1.3 Specialized Training Courses.................................................................................5
3.2 STUDY TOURS .......................................................................................................................5
3.3 STAFF EXCHANGES................................................................................................................5
4.
PARTICIPATION IN CONFERENCES/WORKSHOPS...............................................................6
List of Tables
Table 1
Regional training courses for the UNEP/GEF SCS project to be conducted in
2006-2007.
Table 2
Proposed timetable for the completion of key training programme tasks during
2006 and 2007.
List of Figures
Figure 1
Activity types for the UNEP/GEF Project Training Programme.
Figure
2
Overview of preliminary activities for the UNEP/GEF Project Training
Programme.
Figure 3
Overview of proposed regional training courses, echo seminars/workshops,
and specialized course for the UNEP/GEF Project Training Programme.
Figure 4
Overview of proposed study tours, exchange of personnel, and conferences
and workshops for the UNEP/GEF Project Training Programme.
Figure 5
Schedule of regional meetings for the UNEP/GEF Project during 2006
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 1
1. BACKGROUND
The overall goal of the UNEP/GEF project entitled "Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in
the South China Sea and Gulf of Thailand" is defined in the project document as:
17.
The overall goals of this project are: to create an environment at the regional level, in
which collaboration and partnership in addressing environmental problems of the South China
Sea, between all stakeholders, and at all levels is fostered and encouraged; and to enhance
the capacity of the participating governments to integrate environmental considerations into
national development planning.
Funds from the GEF grant were originally allocated to a variety of activities designed to build capacity
and effect the training required to achieve the medium term objective of "elaborating and agreeing at
the intergovernmental level the Strategic Action Programme encompassing specific targeted and
costed actions for the longer-term, to address the priority issues and concerns". Several forms of
training and capacity building were envisaged in the original project and can be grouped into three
broad categories:
·
Support for Young Scientists working in the demonstration sites;
·
Study Tours to demonstration sites;
·
Training courses and workshops.
By decision of the Project Steering Committee (PSC) funds have been allocated and expended in
support of in-service training of young individuals from the focal ministries in the management and
operation of a complex regional project, through secondment to the Project Co-ordinating Unit.
Individuals from: Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Viet Nam have been
seconded by, their governments to work in the Project Co-ordinating Unit (PCU), in order to become
familiar with the operation and management of the project and the rules of procedure and operational
protocols of the United Nations System. This programme has been remarked upon and commended
in both the Mid-term Evaluation and the Specially Managed Project Review completed in 2004.
In 2004, the PCU prepared a discussion document entitled "Regional Co-ordination, Dissemination of
Experiences, and Personnel Exchange between Sites". This document was considered and refined at
the level of the Regional Working Groups and RSTC before being considered and approved by the
Project Steering Committee and provides operational level details for the exchange programme.
Subsequent to the approval of these procedures the Focal Points responsible for the Demonstration
Sites were to have produced details of what opportunities for training existed at each site, and what
the training needs were at each site.
Training needs and opportunities at the demonstration sites were commented upon only in a few of
the demonstration site proposal documents. This limited information was deemed insufficient for use
in the development of an actual training programme for the project, and in this connection, the Sixth
Meetings of the Regional Working Groups discussed training needs and opportunities specific to the
demonstration sites. In addition questionnaires were completed in each of the meetings, designed to
assess the extent to which capacity had already been built in the Specialised Executing Agencies, the
extent of networking achieved in the preparatory phase and the requirements for further capacity
building during the operational phase of the project.
The needs and opportunities identified by the Working Groups for each of the sites/components
varied greatly in terms of the areas of training, the modes of training, duration and frequency of
training, and the numbers of participants.
At the Sixth Meeting of the Regional Scientific and Technical Committee (RSTC), a small working
group comprised of the National Technical Focal Points from Viet Nam and the Philippines, and the
two expert members Dr. Ong Jin-Eong and Dr. Anond Snidvongs, was formed to discuss an approach
to developing the proposal for a training programme in the context of the South China Sea Project.
The view of the small working group was that there was such a diverse range of requests and
identified needs for training that it would not be practical for the project to develop a training
programme that attempted to meet all needs and that certainly such a programme could not be
developed during that meeting.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 2
In recognition of the complexity of the task of preparing a training programme for the project, a small
sub-committee of the RSTC (comprising Mrs. Wahyu Indraningsih, Dr. Gil Jacinto, Dr. Suvaluck
Satumanatpan, and Dr Ong Jin-Eong) was formed to prepare a proposal. It was agreed that the group
would prepare a preliminary programme that could be circulated to the members of the RSTC by the
end of February 2006 and that members of the RSTC would have one month within which to
comment on the proposal before it was distributed to the regional working groups and other network
members. The following sections reflect the discussions and recommendations of the sub-committee,
that met in the PCU office in Bangkok from 6-10th February 2006.
2.
RATIONALE FOR SELECTION OF TRAINING NEEDS
In arriving at the selection of training needs (a total of 91 requests for training were identified during
the Regional Working Group meetings for the habitat sub-components alone), the sub-committee
essentially considered:
·
The most common needs (from the questionnaire responses),
·
What each of the demonstration sites has to uniquely offer, and,
·
The results of the causal chain analyses of each of the demonstration sites.
Based on the total number of requests or identified needs, the following priorities were apparent:
·
Community-based management,
·
Assessment and monitoring: resource/socio-economic,
·
Fisheries and habitat management,
·
Income generation and financing.
Only a few of the focal points could identify a unique feature of the demonstration sites to share with
potential participants of the training courses.
The analysis of the results of the casual chain analyses of the demonstration sites very strongly
supported the fact that a lack of effective management was the main root cause of environmental
degradation. This was in line with the questionnaire responses where the principal need for training
was management related.
3. TRAINING
OPPORTUNITIES
In order to respond to the identified priority training needs, various training modes and associated
themes for each mode were subsequently identified as follows:
1.
Training courses;
2.
Study tours;
3.
Staff exchanges; and,
4.
Participation in conferences or workshops.
3.1 Training
Courses
Training courses will consist of the following:
1.
Regional training courses;
2.
Echo seminars/workshops conducted at the national or local level by participants of
the regional training courses; and,
3.
Specialized training courses at the regional or national level, depending on the
demand expressed by participants at the end of each regional training course.
3.1.1 Regional Training Courses
Courses conducted at the regional level will last between 1 and 2 weeks, and will focus on six topics
as shown in Table 1. Also shown are the possible course contents & duration, possible implementing
agencies, and experts that may be tapped for the courses.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 3
Table 1
Regional training courses for the UNEP/GEF SCS project to be conducted in 2006-2007.
Tentative
Possible
Course Contents
Possible Experts
Duration
Implementing Agency
UP-MSI (MERF)
Coral reefs/ seagrass resource assessment and monitoring; resource management models
1. Management models &
(e.g., marine parks, marine protected areas, fisheries refugia); socio-economic aspects of coral
Ramkhamhaeng Univ.
T Yeemin; P Alino; MD
strategies for coral reef &
reef/seagrass management (policies & guidelines, local and national legislation, economic
Marine Biodiv
Fortes; Chou LM; S
2 weeks
seagrass ecosystems
valuation, socio-cultural assessment); habitat rehabilitation (transplantation, artificial seagrass);
Research Group
Satumanatpan;
supplemental income generation and financing (e.g., invertebrate and seaweed culture, sea
Kamarruddin
ranching, ecotourism development); and IEC initiatives (print, radio, TV)
2. Mechanisms for
The Matang mangroves experience; guidelines for resources assessment & monitoring
Thailand Environmental
sustainable
(including community-based biodiversity monitoring); carbon & nutrient sequestration; economic
Institute
Ong; Gong; Sanit; Hoang
production/use of
2 weeks
valuation of resources; sustainable production; incentive mechanisms; restoration techniques;
USM - Center for
Tri;
mangroves and other
silvofisheries; IEC initiatives (print, radio, & TV).
Marine and Coastal
wetlands
Studies, Malaysia
Train Sea Coast-
ICM framework; constituency (partnership) building; environmental assessment in ICM;
3. Community-based
Philippines (PCAMRD-
introduction to strategic planning; selected coastal management techniques; plan adoption; plan
2 weeks
Ridzwan; CHARM expert
resource management
DOST)
implementation; attributes of a coastal manager
Silliman University
(Phil) A Alcala
4. Establishment of fisheries
Linking refugia with MPA's; identifying suitable sites for fisheries refugia; FAO-SEAFDEC Code
S Chullasorn; G Silvestre;
1 week
refugia
of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries
SEAFDEC (Thailand)
Y Kato;
5. Economic valuation and
Valuation of marine resources and the socio-economic context; Economic framework; Valuation
T Kusumastanto; G
1 week
CERE (Viet Nam)
sustainable financing
Methods; Policy Implications; Sustainable financing
REECS (Phil)
Samonte; Hoang Tri
Identifying issues and problems; logical framework; causal chain analysis; activities &
6. Project design, planning
components; work plan development; financial planning, budgeting, cost estimation; monitoring
1 week
PCU through SCS
J Pernetta
& financial management
and evaluation
Institute, China ?
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 4
It is recommended that the training course on the establishment of fisheries refugia be supported by
an additional regional training course (and associated echo seminars/workshops) on the identification
of larval fish of key commercial species in the Gulf of Thailand and the South China Sea. Discussions
with the Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC) highlight a lack of expertise in
this field as a main barrier in developing the information base required to support the activity of
establishing fisheries refugia in the region. This additional training course will be developed and
delivered on a collaborative basis by SEAFDEC and the PCU. Outputs will include larval fish
identification sheets/manuals for key commercial species, national level capacity for the processing of
larval fish samples and the identification of larval fish, and a standardized methodology for fish early
life history research in the region.
Course Participants: Participants in the regional training courses may include demonstration site
managers and associated staff, community leaders at demonstration sites, staff of the Specialized
Executing Agencies (SEA's), and members of the national committees (excluding the Chairs as they
would already have had opportunities to learn and benefit from the project)1. No person may attend
more than one regional training course.
Criteria for the choice of participants will include ability to speak and write English, participation at or
familiarity with demonstration sites; ability and willingness to conduct echo seminars/workshops in
their country after the regional training course, and commitment to submit regular blog2 updates in the
project website to facilitate sharing of experiences following the regional training course. The regional
training course would typically have 3, at most 4, participants per country.
Implementing Agency/Group for Regional Training Courses: The regional training courses will be
conducted by, a group or agency that will be identified or proposed by, the RSTC members, and
subcontracted by the Project Coordinating Unit (PCU). The implementing entity could be an existing
SEA, one associated with the regional project, or others, as appropriate.
The contracted agency/group for each regional training course is expected to provide the PCU with
the following:
·
The course syllabus;
·
A description of the training structure and form;
·
A list of experts (with their CV's) that would be used as facilitators/lecturers and the
tasks/contributions of these individuals in the conduct of the course;
·
Venue of the training;
·
An estimate of training costs (e.g., in-country travel and lodging costs, supplies,
consultant and staff fees), and;
·
The schedule of the training.
In addition, the implementing group will be expected to compile lecture notes (e.g., Powerpoint
presentations) and a list of references and handouts that will be given to the participants.
Role of PCU: Once the implementing entity, and a lead individual in the agency have been identified,
the PCU will draft an appropriate Memorandum of Understanding detailing the roles and expectations
of the agency and focal individual. The MoU will contain a work plan and budget in UNEP approved
format. The costs associated with organizing and conducting the training course will be met from the
project budget and the implementing entity shall take responsibility either directly or through a third
party for organizing the travel of participants once these have been identified.
The PCU will take responsibility for soliciting nominations of participants and in consultation with the
implementing entity shall identify the best qualified candidates and inform them of their selection.
3.1.2 Echo
Seminars/Workshops
Shortly after the regional training courses, participants will be expected to conduct "echo"
seminars/workshops in their respective countries or demonstration sites. These echo training
opportunities will provide local participants with abridged versions of the regional training courses and
will be conducted in the local language, as appropriate. These seminars/workshops are envisaged to
last 2 to 3 days and are expected to be conducted within a month of the return of the participants to
their countries.
1 Except for the Project planning and financial management course where National Committee Chairs may attend.
2 A shared on-line journal where people can post diary entries about their personal experiences.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 5
The costs associated with the conduct of these echo seminars will be provided by the project through
the focal points in the SEAs, government or host organisation, as appropriate. The disbursement of
funds will be based on the acceptance of an operational budget and follow standard financial
reporting procedures.
3.1.3 Specialized
Training
Courses
Specialized training courses will be priority topics/skills, which may be taken up during the regional
training courses but where more elaboration may be needed for their use and application in the
participating countries and demonstration sites. These courses will target practitioners and technical
staff, and may be conducted at the regional or in-country level. Topics for these courses may include:
1.
Seagrass monitoring/assessment;
2.
Coral reef monitoring/assessment;
3.
Culture of marine organisms for supplemental livelihood or habitat rehabilitation;
4.
Economic valuation and sustainable financing;
5.
Site level geographic information system (GIS); and,
6.
Estimating carrying capacity of coastal environments using numerical models.
Ideally, these specialized training courses will be handled by, the same individuals responsible for
these topics during the regional training courses. Their mode of involvement will vary according to the
number and complexity of the training course concerned and they may be engaged through
institutional or individual arrangements, as appropriate.
3.2 Study
Tours
Another training mode is the conduct of study tours. The themes and likely venues for this activity are
shown below:
Theme Venue
Role of coastal habitats in mitigating land-based pollutants
Thailand & Cambodia
Sustainable management of mangroves
Matang, Malaysia
Pangasinan and/or Dumaguete
Community-based resource management
City, Philippines
Coral reefs & ecotourism
Palawan, Philippines
In general, participants in the study tours will be those involved in or contributing toward policy
formulation, those involved in demonstration site activities or taking part in similar initiatives, and able
to communicate in spoken and written English3. These would include local government officials, staff
at demonstration sites, members of national committees under this project, national level coordination
officials, and those involved in identified parallel sites to this project.
The study tours may be implemented by the same agencies/groups involved in the conduct of the
regional training courses, and would generally last for one week each.
3.3 Staff
Exchanges
A third mode of training opportunities would be through the exchange of staff and personnel
between/among demonstration sites or project-affiliated staff in the participating countries. During the
early stages of this project, this training mode was implemented through the in-service training of staff
of national focal agencies of participating countries. Individuals from Cambodia, China, Indonesia, the
Philippines, Thailand and Viet Nam spent several months at the Project Coordinating Unit in Bangkok
to learn various skills needed in running a regional project including project planning and financial
management. This will be continued in this phase of the project with opportunities provided to
additional staff at the national or demonstration site level.
3 Although, depending on the need translators may be provided.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 6
In addition, staff exchange may take the form of individuals at a demonstration site in one country
going to a demonstration site in another country to learn specialized skills or methods that may be
used in their locality. For example, one might wish to participate in the process at a demonstration site
of mobilizing various sectors to enact a local ordinance to manage coastal habitats or resources. It
seems obvious from the responses to date that both needs and opportunities might best be served by
periods of time shorter than the six months originally envisaged.
4.
PARTICIPATION IN CONFERENCES/WORKSHOPS
A fourth mode of training would be through participation in conferences or workshops relevant to the
needs of the project. Following the discussion at the Sixth Meeting of the RSTC in Batan, Indonesia
last December, 2005 and the subsequent approval by the Project Steering Committee, it was decided
that around 12 individuals would present papers and take part in the PEMSEA conference to be held
in Hainan, China in December, 2006. Other workshops and conferences that may be relevant and for
which support for participation may be provided could include the following:
·
Integrated Environmental Impact Assessment at the City University of Hong Kong
(June 2006)
·
Coastal Zone Asia Pacific Conference in Indonesia (2006)
·
1st Asia-Pacific Coral Reef Symposium, Hong Kong (June 2006)
·
Society of Wetland Scientists (Australia, July 2006)
Prospective participants will need to show the relevance and advantages of participation at these
conferences and workshops to the goals of the project and/or needs at the demonstration sites.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 7
Figure 1
Activity types for the UNEP/GEF Project Training Programme.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 8
Figure 2
Overview of preliminary activities for the UNEP/GEF Project Training Programme.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 9
Figure 3
Overview of proposed regional training courses, echo seminars/workshops,
and specialized course for the UNEP/GEF Project Training Programme.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 10
Figure 4
Overview of proposed study tours, exchange of personnel, and conferences
and workshops for the UNEP/GEF Project Training Programme.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 11
Figure 5
Schedule of regional meetings for the UNEP/GEF Project during 2006.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 12
Table 2
Proposed timetable for the completion of key training programme tasks during 2006 and 2007.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 13
Table 2 (cont.)
Proposed timetable for the completion of key training programme tasks during 2006 and 2007.
UNEP/GEF/SCS/RSTC/Sub-comm.1/3
Page 14
Table 2 (cont.)
Proposed timetable for the completion of key training programme tasks during 2006 and 2007.